Knowing Jesus #5: The Rocks Will Cry Out

By -
This week's text (Luke 19:28-40) tells the story of Jesus' "triumphal entry" into Jerusalem. But just what does this mean to us as informed readers of Luke's gospel? While Jesus claims the messianic mantle, he also redefines it. Luke is clearly working an angle here. He’s got a tale to tell, a sermon to preach, a message to get across. Do we have ears to hear it? Can we come to know Jesus through this text?

Throughout Luke's two-volume set (Luke-Acts), we detect some important patterns. Geography is one important thread: toward Jerusalem in Luke and away from Jerusalem in Acts. Luke's writing also appears to address the politics of the day. By politics, I mean Luke takes care to demonstrate that the way of Jesus & his followers is not a direct threat to Roman rule. The Ephesian town clerk's speech in Acts 19 is one strong example of this.

Jesus is certainly a king, Luke asserts, but not in the same way that Caesar is a king. They don't directly compete for power. Rome has nothing to fear from these Christians. Luke's account of the "triumphal entry" bears this out even further. There are no palm branches. There are no screaming crowds. It’s just Jesus' followers spreading coats on the ground to welcome him into Zion. And in keeping with the prophetic words of Zechariah 9:9, Jesus rides in on a young donkey. This is hardly the tale of a regal conqueror who wishes to rebel against Roman rule! Instead, Jesus is a humble ruler who comes in peace.

But there is subtle irony in Luke's message. This peace is not good news for everyone. Just as the 8th- and 6th-century prophets condemned Israel & Judah for their corruption, so too Jesus excoriates the Jewish leaders in Luke's gospel. They fail to welcome the messiah. Some Pharisees even attempt to silence the faithful followers who are giving glory to God on behalf of Jesus' arrival.

And while Luke takes care to avoid details that might provoke Roman accusations against Christians, Jesus' claim to kingship undermines everything that powerful people stand for—whether those powerful people sit in Jerusalem or Rome or anywhere else in our world. Jewish leaders have compromised their faith and sold out their people in order to gain wealth, power and prestige. The Roman rulers also have something to fear. While Jesus isn't forming an army, he is calling people to a different kind of peace. His peace is not pax romana—the way of peace established by Roman military might. Jesus offers an alternative vision of a peaceful community.

Do we have something to fear from Jesus? Or is the peace of Christ something you can wrap your mind around? As Jesus enters Jerusalem, you are invited to join this community. Do you hear the invitation of Jesus? Do you join the disciples in calling out, "Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest heaven"?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Love It or List It: We Sold Our Church Building

By -
Image
On October 8, 2023, we held our last worship service in our home of 59 years. We're moving on to a temporary location while we wait for God to reveal where our more permanent home will be. It's been a journey for which there is no solid road map, but we feel blessed by what's happening. We formed a giant circle for the final song at our longtime, northeast Fresno home. In late January, our elders announced a shock decision. We would be selling our church building and moving on. Among the elders, it was an uncontentious and unambiguous decision. They 100% believed it was in the church's best interest to put our property on the market and find a new home. Many congregations have hard choices to make about aging properties that are oversized for today's churches. Selling seemed the most desirable option to our board in our circumstances. I wrote about that decision back in January. You can read about it here . I had an inside seat to their decision-making process. As a
Read more

Galatians 4:1-7 & The Confusing Apostle Paul

By -
Image
Does Galatians 4:1-7 confuse anyone as much as it does me? After studying this for some time, I am prone to agree with the words of 2 Peter 3:16. "There are some things in [Paul's letters] hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures." I hope I'm not one of the ignorant and unstable people. But I'm in the camp of folks who can say that Paul's writings are occasionally hard to understand. Let me clarify what I'm having a hard time clarifying. I don't really think it's difficult to understand Paul's point in Gal 4:1-7. The broader context makes it clear. Paul says that the Law of Moses is inferior to the promise previously made to Abraham. Gentile Christians, he writes, are descendants of Abraham because they share the same faith in God (3:6-7) that Abraham had (Gen 15:6). They therefore don't need to obey Jewish rules and customs. That's his point. from Anthony
Read more

Still Freezing in Abilene

By -
Image
So I've been in a class all week titled "Missional Ecclesiology." It's taken me most of the week just to figure out what the title even means, but it's been a thoroughly invigorating week. Basically, the class is about how church can become a people who are more fully dedicated to the Kingdom of God. Of course this brings up all kinds of questions. If we are going to reshape our churches to more accurately resemble a pursuit of God designs for creation and humanity, what exactly is his aim? Is he merely interested in us going to heaven? Is that what salvation means? And how do we live our communal life in a way that nurtures this vision of salvation? These are deep questions and not so easily dismissed. For example, when I grew up in church, the primary concern was to be saved from sin and not go to hell. So how did we answer this concern? By baptizing people in the right way for the right reason so that they could have assurance of going to heaven. But as we look
Read more