Go Lakers!

By -
We're trying to adapt to California life. One of the things that connects a person to a place is rooting for sports teams. Professional sports teams tend to tie your loyalty to a place. So I've been wondering what California team(s) we might gravitate toward.

All my life, I have been a fan of the Pittsburgh Steelers (6 Super Bowl rings!) and Pittsburgh Pirates (your sympathy is appreciated). You couldn't pay me to stop cheering for the Steelers. The Pirates are too pathetic to cheer for at this point. I grew up near Pittsburgh, and we just spent the last 8 years living only 70 miles from the Steel City. And we typically cheer for the Penguins when it's playoff time -- go Pens!

But one thing Pittsburgh lacks is an NBA team. We've never really followed the NBA that much. I remember the amazing Celtics/Lakers rivalry back when I was a kid. I even saw the Celtics play a game in the old Boston Gaaahden. Great times. But I've never really had a team. I was born near Cleveland, but who would have wanted to root for the Cavs back then? Spending my teen and college years in Tennessee, Atlanta was the closest team. I didn't care for them. If I cheered for anyone, it was the Bulls just cause they were so much fun to watch.

But now, I think we are comfortable cheering for the Lakers. We've been catching games on the radio or TV here and there ever since we moved. And there are no other California teams worth cheering for, I think. So we're taking the plunge and becoming Lakers fans! Jacob already owns Lakers garb. And we'll be glued to the TV tonight cheering for our newest pro team. I know it will be years before we can be viewed as "authentic" Lakers fans, but who cares. We'll jump on the bandwagon & enjoy the ride.

Comments

Thurman8er said…
I used to be a Lakers fan...back in the days of Magic, Kareem, Worthy, and Co. Then basketball became thuggery and I lost interest. It was around the same time that I tired of the grandstanding of football and stopped watching that too. But baseball, with all its problems, has always captivated me. So can I just say this about the Pirates?

I like the Pirates. I think the McLouth trade was awful, but they have a nice offensive core in Morgan, Sanchez, Doumit, and the LaRoche brothers. McCutcheon is going to be exciting to watch, maybe even Rookie of the Year material. Matt Capps is one of the most underrated closers in baseball. And even though the rotation is poor (though I think Duke is the real deal), it's an area they are addressing. In that division, they could contend sooner rather than later.

So there. I have just defended the Pirates. No Stargell's or Clemente's there. Just some kids with a lot of heart.
June 5, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Love It or List It: We Sold Our Church Building

By -
Image
On October 8, 2023, we held our last worship service in our home of 59 years. We're moving on to a temporary location while we wait for God to reveal where our more permanent home will be. It's been a journey for which there is no solid road map, but we feel blessed by what's happening. We formed a giant circle for the final song at our longtime, northeast Fresno home. In late January, our elders announced a shock decision. We would be selling our church building and moving on. Among the elders, it was an uncontentious and unambiguous decision. They 100% believed it was in the church's best interest to put our property on the market and find a new home. Many congregations have hard choices to make about aging properties that are oversized for today's churches. Selling seemed the most desirable option to our board in our circumstances. I wrote about that decision back in January. You can read about it here . I had an inside seat to their decision-making process. As a
Read more

Galatians 4:1-7 & The Confusing Apostle Paul

By -
Image
Does Galatians 4:1-7 confuse anyone as much as it does me? After studying this for some time, I am prone to agree with the words of 2 Peter 3:16. "There are some things in [Paul's letters] hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures." I hope I'm not one of the ignorant and unstable people. But I'm in the camp of folks who can say that Paul's writings are occasionally hard to understand. Let me clarify what I'm having a hard time clarifying. I don't really think it's difficult to understand Paul's point in Gal 4:1-7. The broader context makes it clear. Paul says that the Law of Moses is inferior to the promise previously made to Abraham. Gentile Christians, he writes, are descendants of Abraham because they share the same faith in God (3:6-7) that Abraham had (Gen 15:6). They therefore don't need to obey Jewish rules and customs. That's his point. from Anthony
Read more

Still Freezing in Abilene

By -
Image
So I've been in a class all week titled "Missional Ecclesiology." It's taken me most of the week just to figure out what the title even means, but it's been a thoroughly invigorating week. Basically, the class is about how church can become a people who are more fully dedicated to the Kingdom of God. Of course this brings up all kinds of questions. If we are going to reshape our churches to more accurately resemble a pursuit of God designs for creation and humanity, what exactly is his aim? Is he merely interested in us going to heaven? Is that what salvation means? And how do we live our communal life in a way that nurtures this vision of salvation? These are deep questions and not so easily dismissed. For example, when I grew up in church, the primary concern was to be saved from sin and not go to hell. So how did we answer this concern? By baptizing people in the right way for the right reason so that they could have assurance of going to heaven. But as we look
Read more